Senate President, Dr Bukola Saraki, has said he has no plans
of leaving his party, the All Progressives Congress (APC).
Saraki said this on Sunday, in reaction to a question posed
to him on his Twitter page.
He had been accused of planning to dump the APC for another
party because of the belief that some chieftains of the party, including
President Muhammadu Buhari and a national leader of the party, Senator Bola
Tinubu, were among those behind his travails with the Code of Conduct Bureau
and the Code of Conduct Tribunal.
This was more so as he removed his party’s name from his
Twitter biography.
The CCT had, on Friday, issued a bench warrant for Saraki’s
arrest.
The tribunal, headed by Justice Danladi Umar, ordered the
Inspector General of Police, Solomon Arase, to produce him today before the
CCT.
Arase has, however, said he was yet to receive the order of
the tribunal.
In response to the question on if he was planning to dump
the APC, Saraki wrote: “I remain a card carrying member of my dear party, but
I’m also honoured to serve as Senate president of all senators.”
Meanwhile, loyalists of Saraki and senators opposed to him
were busy weighing options available to them on Sunday, following the trial of
the Senate President at the CCT.
While members of the Senate Unity Forum (SUF), the group of
senators in support of the position of the APC, continued their consultations
in readiness of the possible fallout of the CCT trial of Saraki, his
supporters, mostly of the Like Minds Senators, were also moving to consolidate
his hold on the red chamber.
It was gathered that the SUF had decided to lie low and
allow the ongoing trial get to a head, while they continued the needed
consultations behind the scenes.
A source said one of the forces against Saraki was pushing
for an “Obasanjo option,” which is to pull through the planned arrest and
detention of the Senate president, irrespective of the order of the Federal
High Court on the issue.
Those behind this agenda were claiming that the CCT was not
lower than the High Court and that its orders could only be referred to the
Court of Appeal.
Others were, however, expressing caution that the “Obasanjo
option” could look drastic and reduce the government’s democratic credentials,
especially as the government was still smarting from the fallouts of the
invasion of Akwa-Ibom Government House.
It was also gathered that loyalists of the Senate president
had decided to hold a unity meeting of all senators on September 28, a day
before the advertised resumption.
Although a source said the resumption date no longer remain
sacrosanct, it was gathered that the meeting was being planned to prepare the
ground for Saraki’s solid control of the chamber.
In another development, a new twist appeared to have crept
into workings of the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB), as a member of the Bureau,
on Sunday, said the trial was a contradiction of the Act setting up the CCB and
the CCT.
The member who spoke on condition of anonymity said the
bureau failed to follow the provision of Section 3(d) of its own law by
referring Saraki to trial.
The member said the normal procedure, according to the
Section 3(d) of the Act, was that the Bureau should set up a committee to
determine whether or not an infraction had been committed by any public officer
after submitting his/her asset declaration forms.
Section 3(d) of the CCB Act states: “The functions of the
Bureau shall be ....to receive complaints about non-compliance with or breach
of this Act and where the Bureau considers it necessary to do so, refer such
complaints to the Code of Conduct Tribunal established by Section 20 of this
Act in accordance with Section 20 to 25 of this Act.
“Provided that where the person concerned makes a written
admission of such breach or non-compliance, no reference to the Tribunal shall
be necessary.”
No comments:
Post a Comment