The APC, the Progressives People
Alliance, and Senior Advocates of Nigeria on Thursday blasted
Jonathan and the PDP for ordering the police to withdraw Tambuwal’s
security aides.
Specifically, the APC charged Jonathan to show better understanding of democracy by restoring the police security details.
This was contained in a statement by the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, in Abuja.
According
to the party, the withdrawal of the speaker’s security details amounted
to the usurpation of the role of the judiciary by the IG.
The
party said this was more so bearing in mind that the question of the
interpretation of Section 68(1)(g) of the constitution on which the
Police anchored its “illegal act” is currently before the courts for
resolution.
The statement partly
read, “For avoidance of doubt, the position, including the manner a
person becomes the Speaker of the House of Representatives is to be
found in the constitution, and no constitutional provision or
legislation says membership of the ruling or dominant party in the House
is a pre-requisite.
“Furthermore as
the number four citizen of Nigeria, the security details and apparatus
attached to the person of the speaker are not based on his lineage,
person and or political leaning. It is on account of the position and
the protection required for that position and in Nigeria’s best
interest.
“The APC rejects this
challenge to democracy and modern society. We reject President
Jonathan’s illegality and call for respect and compliance with the law.
“We
reject this meddling in the affairs of the Legislature, especially
given the resolution of Jonathan and his close advisers yesterday at
their meeting to ask the Deputy Speaker, Emeka Ihedioha, to unlawfully
reconvene the House before the adjourned date.”
Also, the APC Caucus in the House described the withdrawal of the security details of the speaker as “incredulous.”
The caucus warned that Jonathan would be held responsible should any harm befall Tambuwal.
Its
Leader, Femi Gbajabiamila, said, “The NPF does not belong to the PDP.
More importantly, the Executive cannot determine for the legislature,
an independent institution and arm of government who will head it or who
its speaker should be.
“This is the
height of impunity. It is ironic that the institution that appropriates
and gives money to the police is the same institution being denigrated
and abused by the same police.”
While the PDP Caucus described the action as unnecessary, the speaker’s office said it was as surprised as Nigerians.
The
Deputy Majority Leader of the House, Mr. Leo Ogor, who spoke for the
PDP Caucus, warned that there should be no external interference in the
defection of the speaker.
Ogor said, “It is totally uncalled for. Let members be allowed to deal with the defection of the speaker by themselves.
“We are fully ready to handle it and I assure you that as soon as we resume, we will take care of it.”
Imam
had before the statement he signed on behalf of Tambuwal, said they
resumed on Thursday to find out that the police personnel attached to
the speaker had been withdrawn.
“We
came to work this morning and what we found was that all the security
men did not report for duty. We are puzzled but that is the situation,”
Imam stated.
The Progressive Peoples
Alliance while condemning the withdrawal of security operatives, advised
the House to challenge the action in court.
Its
National Chairman , Mr. Peter Ameh, said, “There are people who were
elected into the two chambers of the National Assembly and they left,
where were the Police then? Did the Police withdraw their security
details? Let us not take sides; the Police is meant for all, to protect
every citizen of this country.”
Also,
SANs like Femi Falana, Yusuf Ali and Emeka Ngige flayed the police
action, saying it was against the law and portended danger for the
country’s democracy.
Falana advised
the acting the IG to immediately restore them, reminding him of
previous judicial decisions cautioning the Police against taking sides
with political interest groups.
He
said, “The police orderlies were attached to the Speaker by virtue of
his office and not on account of his office and not on account of his
membership of the ruling party.
“The withdrawal of the orderlies by the police authorities is a partisan demonstration of abuse power.”
Ali
said, “To become the Speaker of the House of Representatives is by
election by members of the House. Once you are elected, unless the House
comes together to remove you, you remain the Speaker. At this moment
his is still the Speaker because the House is not in session. He
adjourned the House as the Speaker.
The Police cannot take it upon
themselves to begin to interpret the constitution.”
Similarly,
Ngige said the police were being partisan, adding the Tambuwal ‘s
defection should not attract such treatment from the security agency.
He
said, “The IG cannot interpret the constitution because it is not a
court of law. Unless a court declares his seat vacant that is when the
removal of his security will arise. But if no court has made such a
pronouncement the IG is throwing himself into the arena as a partisan
person by removing his security.”
Senators Babafemi Ojudu; Robert Boroffice ; Kabiru Marafa and Olufemi Lanlehin also condemned the action of the police.
They said it was dangerous for the nation’s democracy.